Aspect
Seeing What's Hidden.
When I first met Danny it appeared to me, as it does to so
many other people, as if he had turned his back on the
world. "Don't take it personally, but I have no choice. I
can only face one way at a time" he once said. What I
didn't realize, and am still coming to understand, is that
he really is
intentionally facing away, to
position himself toward the other side, directly at the
hidden.
He considers these images as a record of this shift in
attention; images pulled from the free-fall of his life as
he deliberately and with self-sacrifice changed his living
aspect. "You can't fake this. I'm lucky I didn't know what
depth really was when I took the leap. But it didn't matter
– I knew I was going regardless. I'm just glad I took
such pretty notes," he laughed.
I'm only just
touching on the many aspects of Danny and his work.
It's a slow process, because I've had to learn to see
things in a new way, from many points of view. Take,
for example, one of his 2' x 2' pieces. This is #13 in
the series, born on 3/1/4. Like all these paintings it
contains numerous points of reference.
Which means to see it, you have to see it in regions. The
first is the whole piece, the apparent object in relation
to the background, color and size and motion and mood all
coming from this level. The object itself, rich with
pattern and line and color and form, is composed of many
other objects, each representative of a distinct domain.
Paintings rest within paintings, regions nest inside
regions. They all have an identity, a certain oneness that
makes it definable and enjoyable in its own right, and at
the same time are intimately integrated with other
distinctively whole bodies and forms.
Each of these little regions is composed of still smaller
regions, little entities living in the bigger entity within
the still bigger entity. They are as dunes within a desert,
leaves upon a tree, cells within a beast.
Remarkably, when you've seen as many of these regions as
possible, down to the smallest perceivable world, there is
still more. For hidden in this scant matter are other
dimensions revealed by the paintings relationship with
light.
Pour light in from the side and one dimension of color is
revealed. Cut it hard against the source and another
emerges, like golden mounds turning to snowcapped hills,
winter into summer. Sparks emerge and scatter just beneath
color and shape, a fire of light trapped in motion. Shadows
show where no shadow exists, deep pockets where all is
actually flat, revealed by the motion of light, like
landscapes of endless perturbation beheld under shifting
skies.
Driving the piece against the light in this manner
inevitably brings one directly in relation to the source,
and as the image intensifies and brilliance bursts forth,
the ultimate flash of gut-grabbing richness is overwhelmed
by the source itself, the center of the light, like staring
directly at the sun.
And like the qualities of light that stir our soul at the
rise and setting of the sun, the number and intensity of
the light sources used to bring the piece to life further
creates realms of variation. Brighten light brings
boldness, dimmed brings the mysterious, multiple lights
reveal roundness, and fluctuations of intensity find motion
in the entire work.
How many aspects are there in a piece? I've yet to run out.
Perhaps there is a finite number of angles and sources and
moods and elements and regions and painted works
themselves, but in my time I have seen nothing but
individual works of infinitely variable art.
Worlds>